Wow, quite a write-up on Renee on the BAL, huh?

Let's see, a claim is made that there has been verification of who wrote a comment regarding Renee.  I am assuming that one of "the Editors" also writes for the Enquirer-you know that ridiculous rag that claims a man was impregnated by an Alien?  Yep, they always have the proof, too.  Anyone who has watched this nonsense unfold knows the propaganda behind it.  I don't buy the Enquirer because I'm smarter than that, and I don't buy this website for the same reason.

"…we include facts to support our position…"  LOL, so does the Enquirer.  A friend of a friend of a distant cousin of her best friend's boyfriend's mother said so.  Indisputably accurate, yes?

So this "Editor" goes on to explain all the inside information, not only into Renee's family, but also into Mark's.  Hmmm, that surely means that the person giving this information truly is an insider heavily involved in the family happenings-oh, wait a minute, how can that be if they are all estranged from Renee?  Well, why question something that might throw doubt on the expertise of the writer, hmmm?

All through this nonsense are claims of "irrefutable evidence", but the only "evidence" is he said/she said, unsubstantiated claims.  How does that constitute "irrefutable evidence?"  I guess that depends on whether you are a member of the people population or the sheeple population (the ones who buy the Enquirer to find out when the guy who is pregnant with the alien baby is due).  They actually want someone to believe that "Mr. Petrie" never speaks a word to anyone about what's going on between himself and Renee.  Right, we've seen him not do that in public writings on a public message board and on the Project several times (wink, wink).  PUUUUHHHLLLEEZE "Editors" do you honestly want someone to believe that he is forced to act against a court order for his own protection????  Could it be that that is why Renee really DOESN'T publicize this stuff?  I mean the only thing you hear about Renee's private life is on the Project, from Jim's mouth or from those who know him (who are also members of the Project), yet "the Editors" would have you believe that Renee is doing all of these things to herself.  You would have to be a total "whackadoodle" to believe that.

Again, if Mr. Petrie is not feeding information to "the Editors", which would violate court orders to not discuss these issues, how do "the Editors" get all this personal information.  I mean look at this, they even know her intentions!  That must be some crystal ball they have there to be able to know what other people are thinking!  Gees, I wish I could just touch the hem of their garment and perhaps I could be imparted with the magical powers of mind reading that "the Editors" have.  If Mr. Petrie is not unlawfully feeding this information to "the Editors" one must wonder what their obsession is with a woman who has not done advocacy work in years and years.  Could it be "the Editors" are a group of people who claim 100% success in getting kids back for parents and that Mr. Petrie is a client either of theirs or "one of the attorneys" involved with FRAI.  Couldn't have Renee ruining a perfect record, now could they?

Hmmm, maybe this is a clue "She included others in her requests for protective orders against her husband, people she hates, including Ms. Shell and Ms. Henson."  Does it strike anyone else as odd that "the Editors" are so incredibly supportive of Ms. Shell.  I mean, I asked a friend of mine who does profiling work professionally what she thought of how defensive "the Editors" are of Ms. Shell, and she seems to think Ms. Shell is one of "the Editors".  Hmmm, that's supported by an IP check of one of the posts on the Project, which was sent from Ms. Shell's computer.  Probably a coincidence-to those who believe the pregnant guy will give birth to an alien any minute now.

So now we get into a personality profile written by someone who apparently knows herself very well.  Interestingly, I note the comment "…rejection by a narcissist is the worst punishment she could inflict upon anyone."  Yes, that does give one a tremendous insight-but not into Renee, I'm afraid.  Think about it.  Watch, listen, think for yourself.  The truth is not a difficult thing to discern.

Obsessed with winning and being right:  Wow, and look at those posts on the Project.  You can see how they twist and turn everything that is said by Leonard and Ron into something imaginary.  Strangely, I don't find anything Renee has written about her own life telling people all these marvelous things "the Editors" learned through consulting their "crystal balls".

The delusion of infallibility:  Again, look at the posts on the Project.  The evidence is overwhelming.  How could an intelligent person miss it?  Last word…twisted logic…shouts the loudest…public attacks on those who refuse to respond…irrational and unreasonable requests…views lack of response as a victory-yep it's all there in black and white.  Even a blind man could see it.

If someone walks away, she continues her tirade:  Yep, even after someone opts out of the little narcissist club, the posts continue.  Every now and then they are revisited for whatever reason.  Now here's a cute one.  Cannot simply agree to disagree…she must either convert or destroy.  Hmmm, so if one can agree to disagree with FRIENDS, but must convert or destroy all others, does that constitute targeting opponents?  I suppose the only one who can truly answer that is the only intelligent person on earth-you know, the one who makes all the rules and gives all the definitions for every word in the English language, and who is the only expert in the field of advocacy, and knows what people think and why they behave as they do (presumably an expert in psychology), and who is the only person who can make things better for families and children, and the only one who has the intelligence and knowledge to write books, teach seminars, rule the world of advocacy, make valid decisions of law, and on, and on, and on.  Would you call that a "grandiose sense of self-importance"?

All Suzanne Shell's problems are AFRA's fault, no matter whose fault it really is.  She is never responsible for her own self-induced problems, including the fact that nobody wants to come to her seminars and listen to her dribble about things everyone who has ever been through a CPS case already knows?  Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!!!  Wow, and the evidence is just splashed all over the Project for anyone to see.

The funniest one of all here "Read what Renee says about being a great stripper."  LOL, read what Suzanne says about being the Alpha and Omega of the advocacy world.  Renee has absolutely NOTHING on Suzanne when it comes to requiring excessive admiration.  And even funnier, the claim that Renee possesses a strong sense of inappropriate entitlement.  We have the "Queen of Advocacy" proclaiming her absolute omnipotence daily, claiming to be the only one worthy of training advocates IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!!!

Ruthlessly takes advantage of others to achieve her own ends-again, we saw what she did with Leonard, Ron and others to make herself look like the poor picked on victim of…um, well, you look at it.  I think anyone who can "find" the offenses Ms. Shell found in the writings of these two men must be delusional and/or paranoid.

Then we go to more dribble from the crystal balls and the "absolute proof" that Renee is what "the Editors" say she is because-um, because they consult the crystal balls?  How many people really believe these unsubstantiated claims are substantiated "because we say so"?  How many people pretend they do because they are afraid of what "the Editors" might say?

Casual dishonestly and cruelty, lack of empathy-all things we read in the on line comic book known as the Project.  All the self-proclaimed "professionals" who wouldn't know what professional behavior was if it bit them, dictating rules to others that they are incapable themselves of following, to manipulate the audience into believing their grandiose claims of perfect supremacy.  What a shame that she is not the goddess she claims to be, the one with all the answers who, if we listed to her, would be able to solve all the problems of the world in an instant.  The question comes to mind that if she were truly all she says she is, how could AFRA stop her?  If she has all the answers, why is she the only one singing her praises?

There are a few truths to this article.  Classic narcissists want to own it all, be everywhere, and experience everything.  They cannot take "no" for an answer.  The narcissist is a superb emotional manipulator and extortionist.  They often stalk and harass, live in a state of constant rage, and are paranoid, suspicious, and unpredictable.

The greatest truth appears to be contained in the final text box…that "[someone]" intended to set herself up as queen over all she surveys and is jealous that there is any competition.  That person is abusive and neglectful toward anyone she views as competition, and will stop at nothing to stomp out any and all competition, whether real or imaginary.  I am assuming the names were changed to protect the innocent?