aka Tommy Dutkiewicz , the master of 4th amendment mysteries, the brain trust who consented to DCF entry into his home then SUED the caseworkers for 4th amendment violations (a lost, of course), has outdone himself with the following press release. BTW, Staff Writers are Tommy and whatever frogs live in his pockets.  (Yeah, sort of like you and the BAL-"the Editors" are your frogs.)

Hello-o-o Tommy. Texas CPS and Texas Rangers had a search warrant, you dumb hockey puck. They get to come in and gather whatever is listed on that search warrant. Geez, you'd think after getting it WRONG every time he tries to write about the 4th amendment, he'd research before he publishes. . .reminds me of that goofy article he wrote for chicken owners about washing their chickens, and he has never owned chickens, but he the authority on, well, everything. . .NOT!  (Oh, that's right, you get to say who's the authority on everything because...????  You got it, folks, she is the authority on, well, everything...NOT!)
May 30, 2008

Staff Writers
Connecticut DCF Watch

CPS Workers Have New Additional Problems With 460 Children

They can't enter any home or speak with any children as ruled by the Federal Courts. (relevant citation? doesn't exist)  (Duh!  And when the citation is put on the books are you going to say you were the original publisher of that, too?)

Texas - What wasn't reported is that by the very ruling by the Appellate and Supreme Court, Child Protection Service ("CPS") can not enter ANY home or speak with any child because there was NO imminent physical danger present which is the legal standard to remove a child. As ruled in Doe v. Heck (the famous and oft-erroneously-cited case by Tommy, which says CPS can't go into a PRIVATE SCHOOL if the principle refuses entry - ti doesn't apply to private homes, you dumb hocky puck)  (Oh, my, look at that spelling.  Someone needs a nap.  Now we all know name-calling is abusive, and we know that only abusive people are abusive, so what does that tell us?  Boys and girls, do you know?), absent imminent physical danger, it has been ruled by the Federal Courts that it is an unreasonable search and seizure of a child if they even speak with a child.

CPS and the family court ARE subject to the 4th and 14th Amendment. Risk of harm or possibility of harm is NOT probable case as ruled by the federal court (no citations again. . .just blathering.) (blathering is an appropriate description and you really need to stop it, Suzanne, someone will think you're, well...you.) Anonymous phone calls are NOT probable cause either, there MUST be credible evidence. By the very ruling of the Appellate and Supreme Court in Texas, there was NO evidence presented to support the unlawful removal, there was NO imminent physical danger. They can not go on any unlawful fishing expeditions into homes. They have to have their evidence a head of time. They can't go in and "develop" the evidence. <snip>
Hey Suzanne HELLO The Texas Supreme Court said TEXAS CPS didn't have a
leg to stand has to give back all the little kiddies they illegally
stole.  You are the one looking like the Wackadoodle on this one.